Perhaps the maximum could be set automatically at the highest grade anyone obtained? This could be a problem though, as if no one makes any effort, even small scores will equal large percentages. Maybe the teacher could set the scope of the scale? I set the students the task of hitting 10 stars as a minimum, so maybe 10 could equal 100% in this case, with any extra marks being set as a bonus. Still leaves the problem of how to deal with the bonus. How about combining the two so that if no one hits the minimum, all marks are treated as percentages of the teacher-imposed total, but if people exceed it, the highest grade is the maximum?
A number would be great IMO, it means that students who put a lot more effort in will get a much higher score, which seems fairer. It also mimics the discussion book concept of having a register open during a class discussion and putting a tick by a pupils name every time they say something constructive. I've used this a lot as it gives public credit to the students who are helpful/keen in this respect, but are less academic.
It would be better in the scores bit I think (if this grading option was chosen). Feedback is still good for holding notes and teachers may want to add comments whilst the forum is still active, which might interfere and I'm also not sure that displaying the original scale in the gradebook would mean much if the main criteria is how many total stars you get.
Yes the issue was how to deal with the concept of having no maximum grade in the gradebook. It's a concept that gets used all the time for averages etc not to mention how do you display it? (you can't display 100 stars because that's not on the scale).
Perhaps we could just put the unlimited total in the feedback field as a number?