Petr Škoda (skodak) added a comment - 08/Feb/09 07:32 AM

Petr Škoda (skodak) added a comment - 08/Feb/09 07:32 AM I think we should better wait for final decisions related to enrolment changes

Jason Hardin added a comment - 17/Feb/09 05:05 AM

Jason Hardin added a comment - 17/Feb/09 05:05 AM What exactly does that mean Petr? Will the enrollment changes affect 1.9 or is this all 2.0? If this is 2.0 then we would reimplement all of these changes in 2.0 as well once the enrollment changes happen. Holding off on implementing these changes to wait for 2.0 doesn't seem to make sense.

Michael Penney added a comment - 17/Feb/09 10:51 AM

Michael Penney added a comment - 17/Feb/09 10:51 AM Petr you may also want to look it over - implements some of the ideas you and Chris discussed.

Petr Škoda (skodak) added a comment - 17/Feb/09 03:29 PM

Petr Škoda (skodak) added a comment - 17/Feb/09 03:29 PM thanks, there will be an enrolment meeting soon - I hope we will get to some final decision for 2.0 and then it should be much easie to decide what gets into 1.9.x thanks for the patch

Ryan Sanders added a comment - 12/Aug/09 05:47 PM

Ryan Sanders added a comment - 12/Aug/09 05:47 PM thanks for DIFF patch. suggest following changes, the "enrol_dbtable" be changed to... enrol_dbtable_FROM also adding enrol_dbtable_WHERE do the same thing as above to "enrol_coursetable" adding ability to choose "date format" that is in external database for each of the 3, date fields. adding ability to set "enrol_student_unroll_id_field" (much like local user role field), but option, to either UN-enroll students completely from course, or change there roles to this role in the external database. Plus, there should be another enrol_unenroll_field, for a per course basis. of either un-enrolling or changing role in course. for rhyme and reasons see http://moodle.org/mod/forum/discuss.php?d=129964 granted i am dealing with oscommerce, but functionality can spill over to multi other third party software with the more advance functionality.