Moodle
  1. Moodle
  2. MDL-27830

Backport user friendly block setting improvements to MOODLE_20_STABLE

    Details

    • Type: Improvement Improvement
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Blocker Blocker
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Affects Version/s: 2.0.3
    • Fix Version/s: STABLE backlog
    • Component/s: Blocks
    • Labels:
    • Affected Branches:
      MOODLE_20_STABLE
    • Rank:
      17471

      Description

      Once MDL-27829 has been resolved and both that plus MDL-26105 have been tested we should look at the user friendly block settings improvement and decide whether it should be backported to MOODLE_20_STABLE.

        Issue Links

          Activity

          Hide
          Eloy Lafuente (stronk7) added a comment -

          Just to note that this regression should be also fixed here if finally the friendly block settings are backported to 20_STABLE: MDL-27941

          Show
          Eloy Lafuente (stronk7) added a comment - Just to note that this regression should be also fixed here if finally the friendly block settings are backported to 20_STABLE: MDL-27941
          Hide
          Sam Hemelryk added a comment -

          Hi guys,
          Added a few watchers to this issue to get a bit of feedback.

          Do we want to backport the friendly block setting improvements to 2.0 now that we appear to be largely free of regressions?

          Personally I don't think there is reason to worry about it now that 2.1 is out but what does everyone else think?

          Cheers
          Sam

          Show
          Sam Hemelryk added a comment - Hi guys, Added a few watchers to this issue to get a bit of feedback. Do we want to backport the friendly block setting improvements to 2.0 now that we appear to be largely free of regressions? Personally I don't think there is reason to worry about it now that 2.1 is out but what does everyone else think? Cheers Sam
          Hide
          Petr Škoda added a comment -

          My +1 to concentrate on problem in 2.1 or better 2.2. Why would we release 2.1 if everything was backported to 2.0? Short release cycles should mean a lot less backporting and less support for older releases.

          Show
          Petr Škoda added a comment - My +1 to concentrate on problem in 2.1 or better 2.2. Why would we release 2.1 if everything was backported to 2.0? Short release cycles should mean a lot less backporting and less support for older releases.
          Hide
          Ray Lawrence added a comment -

          +1 2.1 focus on this.

          Show
          Ray Lawrence added a comment - +1 2.1 focus on this.
          Hide
          Sam Hemelryk added a comment -

          Closing this issue, these changes will not be backported to 2.0

          Show
          Sam Hemelryk added a comment - Closing this issue, these changes will not be backported to 2.0

            People

            • Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              4 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              • Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: