Uploaded image for project: 'Moodle'
  1. Moodle
  2. MDL-30993

time API, check and update DocBlock

    Details

      Description

      Check and update documentation, so that it should comply with moodle coding guidelines.
      Following needs to be updated/checked for time api

      1. DocBlock for page and functions.
      2. All the files should be checked/updated.

      Note: You can create sub-tasks, so as to avoid bulk integration.

        Gliffy Diagrams

          Attachments

            Issue Links

              Activity

              Hide
              salvetore Michael de Raadt added a comment -

              Omm nomm nomm. I eat documentation for breakfast.

              I'm seeing a bit of variety for between people indenting when doc tag comments break over lines. Also, different people are aligning tag values/comments differently; some with alignment, some removing all alignment.

              Some comments:

              • Lines 1825, 1942, 2012, 2063, 2084, 2141, 2168, 2197, could benefit from more explanation of possible values
              • Lines 1825, 1942 are inconsistent in its use of mixed

              Looks pretty good.

              Show
              salvetore Michael de Raadt added a comment - Omm nomm nomm. I eat documentation for breakfast. I'm seeing a bit of variety for between people indenting when doc tag comments break over lines. Also, different people are aligning tag values/comments differently; some with alignment, some removing all alignment. Some comments: Lines 1825, 1942, 2012, 2063, 2084, 2141, 2168, 2197, could benefit from more explanation of possible values Lines 1825, 1942 are inconsistent in its use of mixed Looks pretty good.
              Hide
              rajeshtaneja Rajesh Taneja added a comment -

              Thanks for the feedback Michael,
              Branches updated with your feedback. Can you please peer review this for me.

              Show
              rajeshtaneja Rajesh Taneja added a comment - Thanks for the feedback Michael, Branches updated with your feedback. Can you please peer review this for me.
              Hide
              rajeshtaneja Rajesh Taneja added a comment -

              Thanks for the feedback Michael,
              I have added link for timezone and pushing this for integration review.

              Still working on doc page.

              Show
              rajeshtaneja Rajesh Taneja added a comment - Thanks for the feedback Michael, I have added link for timezone and pushing this for integration review. Still working on doc page.
              Hide
              rajeshtaneja Rajesh Taneja added a comment -
              Show
              rajeshtaneja Rajesh Taneja added a comment - Updated doc page http://docs.moodle.org/dev/Time_API
              Hide
              samhemelryk Sam Hemelryk added a comment -

              Hi Raj,

              Looking for comment on the following things before this gets integrated/rejected.

              1. @package. phpdoc manual states that @package is only applicable to procedural pages and classes. I don't think we should be setting this on functions, I haven't heard any discussion on this and/or modifying package x to support such a thing. Given we have category now for that sort of hackery however it gets my -1 on adding any @package to functions.
              2. @access. I'm not sure about using `@access public` on either classes or functions. This information is redundant as functions and classes are public by default and are only private/protected because of early coding practises or bad design. Personally I think we shouldn't use @access public. I think we should only use @access protected, and @access private.
              3. I don't like the forced alignment that is going on with @package, @category, etc where you've got an @xxx multiple spaces and then the value. I remember Sam Marshall wrote a great article about the annoyances that sort of alignment causes and given that we don't do a similar thing with other @ declarations like @param I think we shouldn't encourage such alignment (I know there are cases of it but in general we don't align vars like that because of the misalignment caused as code changes). Found the post: http://learn.open.ac.uk/mod/oublog/viewpost.php?post=74901 (gets syndicated everywhere as well of course). I'm up for convincing otherwise on this one, presently my personal preference is as stated, but really I think we should just be clear on what we are doing and try to do it consistently.
              4. @return mixed on get_user_timezone could be improved.
              5. @return for get_timezone_record shouldn't use object, should use stdClass. Remember the object class has been deprecated since 2.0 (git show 4f92410fb5)

              Just noting:

              • The third argument to the get_record call in get_timezone_record is incorrect. true == IGNORE_MULTIPLE and should be changed at some point. Will create an issue for that.

              Let me know your thoughts.
              Cheers
              Sam

              Show
              samhemelryk Sam Hemelryk added a comment - Hi Raj, Looking for comment on the following things before this gets integrated/rejected. @package. phpdoc manual states that @package is only applicable to procedural pages and classes. I don't think we should be setting this on functions, I haven't heard any discussion on this and/or modifying package x to support such a thing. Given we have category now for that sort of hackery however it gets my -1 on adding any @package to functions. @access. I'm not sure about using `@access public` on either classes or functions. This information is redundant as functions and classes are public by default and are only private/protected because of early coding practises or bad design. Personally I think we shouldn't use @access public. I think we should only use @access protected, and @access private. I don't like the forced alignment that is going on with @package, @category, etc where you've got an @xxx multiple spaces and then the value. I remember Sam Marshall wrote a great article about the annoyances that sort of alignment causes and given that we don't do a similar thing with other @ declarations like @param I think we shouldn't encourage such alignment (I know there are cases of it but in general we don't align vars like that because of the misalignment caused as code changes). Found the post: http://learn.open.ac.uk/mod/oublog/viewpost.php?post=74901 (gets syndicated everywhere as well of course). I'm up for convincing otherwise on this one, presently my personal preference is as stated, but really I think we should just be clear on what we are doing and try to do it consistently. @return mixed on get_user_timezone could be improved. @return for get_timezone_record shouldn't use object, should use stdClass. Remember the object class has been deprecated since 2.0 (git show 4f92410fb5) Just noting: The third argument to the get_record call in get_timezone_record is incorrect. true == IGNORE_MULTIPLE and should be changed at some point. Will create an issue for that. Let me know your thoughts. Cheers Sam
              Hide
              rajeshtaneja Rajesh Taneja added a comment -

              Thanks for the feedback Sam,

              1. You are right, but we have agreed upon using @package tag for functions, as functions are scattered in different files for CORE_API, hence for this project we made this as exception to group these using package tag.
              2. I agree with this information is redundant for public, but I don't see any harm in adding this information.
              3. Not sure of this, will check with you before changing/reverting
              4. will update this
              5. Will update this
              Show
              rajeshtaneja Rajesh Taneja added a comment - Thanks for the feedback Sam, You are right, but we have agreed upon using @package tag for functions, as functions are scattered in different files for CORE_API, hence for this project we made this as exception to group these using package tag. I agree with this information is redundant for public, but I don't see any harm in adding this information. Not sure of this, will check with you before changing/reverting will update this Will update this
              Hide
              rajeshtaneja Rajesh Taneja added a comment -

              Thanks for discussing this Sam, Summarizing it below:

              1. @package is used in functions where function can't be grouped under @package of file/class. Example is moodlelib.php having preference_api, time api etc. functions which can't be grouped under single package.
              2. @acess public is no harm but is a redundant information and should not be used. Saying so, @acess private and @access protected is acceptable.
              3. Forced alignment of tags should be consistent in docblock. It's up-to the developer to go either way (aligned or single space), but it should be consistent for the whole docblock.
              Show
              rajeshtaneja Rajesh Taneja added a comment - Thanks for discussing this Sam, Summarizing it below: @package is used in functions where function can't be grouped under @package of file/class. Example is moodlelib.php having preference_api, time api etc. functions which can't be grouped under single package. @acess public is no harm but is a redundant information and should not be used. Saying so, @acess private and @access protected is acceptable. Forced alignment of tags should be consistent in docblock. It's up-to the developer to go either way (aligned or single space), but it should be consistent for the whole docblock.
              Hide
              rajeshtaneja Rajesh Taneja added a comment -

              Branches updated with your suggestions
              Also, created issue for third argument to the get_record

              Show
              rajeshtaneja Rajesh Taneja added a comment - Branches updated with your suggestions Also, created issue for third argument to the get_record
              Hide
              mudrd8mz David Mudrák added a comment -

              I am especially happy about #3 in the summary above. Thanks guys.

              Show
              mudrd8mz David Mudrák added a comment - I am especially happy about #3 in the summary above. Thanks guys.
              Hide
              samhemelryk Sam Hemelryk added a comment -

              Stopping review this issue will be held back til next week.

              Show
              samhemelryk Sam Hemelryk added a comment - Stopping review this issue will be held back til next week.
              Hide
              stronk7 Eloy Lafuente (stronk7) added a comment -

              Moving all the phpdocs-related issues out from current integration, will be examined next week.

              Note that all these issues are going to be applied exclusively to master, that has been summarily decided by the integration team after hea(t)ring everybody.

              Ciao

              Show
              stronk7 Eloy Lafuente (stronk7) added a comment - Moving all the phpdocs-related issues out from current integration, will be examined next week. Note that all these issues are going to be applied exclusively to master, that has been summarily decided by the integration team after hea(t)ring everybody. Ciao
              Hide
              stronk7 Eloy Lafuente (stronk7) added a comment -

              The main moodle.git repository has just been updated with latest weekly modifications. You may wish to rebase your PULL branches to simplify history and avoid any possible merge conflicts. This would also make integrator's life easier next week.

              TIA and ciao

              Show
              stronk7 Eloy Lafuente (stronk7) added a comment - The main moodle.git repository has just been updated with latest weekly modifications. You may wish to rebase your PULL branches to simplify history and avoid any possible merge conflicts. This would also make integrator's life easier next week. TIA and ciao
              Hide
              rajeshtaneja Rajesh Taneja added a comment -

              branch re-based.

              Show
              rajeshtaneja Rajesh Taneja added a comment - branch re-based.
              Hide
              samhemelryk Sam Hemelryk added a comment -

              Hi Raj,

              Reopening this, just been going through the ideas for @package and @package for this should be core not core_time.

              Cheers
              Sam

              Show
              samhemelryk Sam Hemelryk added a comment - Hi Raj, Reopening this, just been going through the ideas for @package and @package for this should be core not core_time. Cheers Sam
              Hide
              rajeshtaneja Rajesh Taneja added a comment -

              Thanks Sam,
              I have updated @package. Pushing it back for your review.

              Show
              rajeshtaneja Rajesh Taneja added a comment - Thanks Sam, I have updated @package. Pushing it back for your review.
              Hide
              stronk7 Eloy Lafuente (stronk7) added a comment -

              Marked as integrated (master). Thanks Sam et Rajesh!

              Show
              stronk7 Eloy Lafuente (stronk7) added a comment - Marked as integrated (master). Thanks Sam et Rajesh!
              Hide
              stronk7 Eloy Lafuente (stronk7) added a comment -

              Passing, just re-reviewed that:

              • phpdocs look correct.
              • all the changes are phpdocs.
              • it didn't break any check in the CI server.

              So that should be enough. Ciao

              Show
              stronk7 Eloy Lafuente (stronk7) added a comment - Passing, just re-reviewed that: phpdocs look correct. all the changes are phpdocs. it didn't break any check in the CI server. So that should be enough. Ciao
              Hide
              stronk7 Eloy Lafuente (stronk7) added a comment -

              Your nice code represents only 1/46 of the issues that have been sent upstream this week, so thanks, but not many.

              Nah, joking, many thanks! Closing this a fixed, ciao

              Show
              stronk7 Eloy Lafuente (stronk7) added a comment - Your nice code represents only 1/46 of the issues that have been sent upstream this week, so thanks, but not many. Nah, joking, many thanks! Closing this a fixed, ciao

                People

                • Votes:
                  0 Vote for this issue
                  Watchers:
                  1 Start watching this issue

                  Dates

                  • Created:
                    Updated:
                    Resolved:
                    Fix Release Date:
                    25/Jun/12