Uploaded image for project: 'Moodle'
  1. Moodle
  2. MDL-31469

optional formslib date selector element generates invaild HTML

    Details

    • Type: Bug
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Minor
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Affects Version/s: 2.0.7, 2.1.4, 2.2.1, 2.3
    • Fix Version/s: 2.1.5, 2.2.2
    • Component/s: Forms Library
    • Labels:
    • Testing Instructions:
      Hide

      note to tester: you could test the related MDL-31469 at the same time

      1. Go to any from that includes optional dates, for example the quiz settings form.
      2. Validate the HTML, and verify that there are no errors about <label for="">.

      Show
      note to tester: you could test the related MDL-31469 at the same time 1. Go to any from that includes optional dates, for example the quiz settings form. 2. Validate the HTML, and verify that there are no errors about <label for="">.
    • Affected Branches:
      MOODLE_20_STABLE, MOODLE_21_STABLE, MOODLE_22_STABLE, MOODLE_23_STABLE
    • Fixed Branches:
      MOODLE_21_STABLE, MOODLE_22_STABLE
    • Pull from Repository:
    • Pull Master Branch:

      Description

      The [] Enabled checkbox is output including <label for="">. We need a correct id there.

        Gliffy Diagrams

          Issue Links

            Activity

            Hide
            timhunt Tim Hunt added a comment -

            Submitting for integration.

            Show
            timhunt Tim Hunt added a comment - Submitting for integration.
            Hide
            stronk7 Eloy Lafuente (stronk7) added a comment -

            The main moodle.git repository has just been updated with latest weekly modifications. You may wish to rebase your PULL branches to simplify history and avoid any possible merge conflicts. This would also make integrator's life easier next week.

            TIA and ciao

            Show
            stronk7 Eloy Lafuente (stronk7) added a comment - The main moodle.git repository has just been updated with latest weekly modifications. You may wish to rebase your PULL branches to simplify history and avoid any possible merge conflicts. This would also make integrator's life easier next week. TIA and ciao
            Hide
            nebgor Aparup Banerjee added a comment -

            Thanks Tim, thats been integrated now into 21, 22 and master.

            tester: you could test the related MDL-31445 at the same time.

            Show
            nebgor Aparup Banerjee added a comment - Thanks Tim, thats been integrated now into 21, 22 and master. tester: you could test the related MDL-31445 at the same time.
            Hide
            abgreeve Adrian Greeve added a comment -

            I checked this in version 2.1, 2.2 and master. I also tested this in different forms (quiz, forum, data). Everything checked out fine.
            I also ran an HTML validation tool on the pages. Nothing came up that related to this fix.
            Thanks Tim.

            Show
            abgreeve Adrian Greeve added a comment - I checked this in version 2.1, 2.2 and master. I also tested this in different forms (quiz, forum, data). Everything checked out fine. I also ran an HTML validation tool on the pages. Nothing came up that related to this fix. Thanks Tim.
            Hide
            stronk7 Eloy Lafuente (stronk7) added a comment -

            A bit later this week, but finally your changes have been accepted and are now available in all the upstream git/cvs servers.

            Many thanks & ciao

            Show
            stronk7 Eloy Lafuente (stronk7) added a comment - A bit later this week, but finally your changes have been accepted and are now available in all the upstream git/cvs servers. Many thanks & ciao

              People

              • Votes:
                0 Vote for this issue
                Watchers:
                1 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                • Created:
                  Updated:
                  Resolved:
                  Fix Release Date:
                  12/Mar/12