Moodle
  1. Moodle
  2. MDL-32012

backup/restore from M1.9 to M2.x does not preserve linking between resources

    Details

    • Testing Instructions:
      Hide

      Create backup:
      In Moodle 1.9 -
      In course file, create a folder, in it place two files, a image, and a html file that loads that image as a relative path (<img src="img.jpg>").
      On the front page of the course, and a Link to a file and link to the html file.
      Backup the course and download it.

      NOTE: I've attached a sample backup that is confirmed to exhibit the behavior, and also includes a 3 level deep folder test.

      In moodle 2.x
      Go into a course, go to restore, and add the 1.9 backup.
      You can restore into the existing course, merging, and use all the default settings, except on step "4. Schema" set overwrite course settings to Yes (this is because of a seeming bug that makes legacy files that may be needed by resources unavailable unless this is done).

      Complete the restore.

      Bad behavior:
      If you edit the resource created, you will notice that img.html is at the base level, instead of in a folder. If you were to upgrade the 1.9 site it would be in the subfolder.
      If you try and view the resource, the image will show as broken.

      Behavior after patch:
      The file structure is recreated in the resource, and when you view the resource, it will load in the image.

      Show
      Create backup: In Moodle 1.9 - In course file, create a folder, in it place two files, a image, and a html file that loads that image as a relative path (<img src="img.jpg>"). On the front page of the course, and a Link to a file and link to the html file. Backup the course and download it. NOTE: I've attached a sample backup that is confirmed to exhibit the behavior, and also includes a 3 level deep folder test. In moodle 2.x Go into a course, go to restore, and add the 1.9 backup. You can restore into the existing course, merging, and use all the default settings, except on step "4. Schema" set overwrite course settings to Yes (this is because of a seeming bug that makes legacy files that may be needed by resources unavailable unless this is done). Complete the restore. Bad behavior: If you edit the resource created, you will notice that img.html is at the base level, instead of in a folder. If you were to upgrade the 1.9 site it would be in the subfolder. If you try and view the resource, the image will show as broken. Behavior after patch: The file structure is recreated in the resource, and when you view the resource, it will load in the image.
    • Workaround:
      Hide

      Patch is attached.

      Show
      Patch is attached.
    • Affected Branches:
      MOODLE_22_STABLE
    • Fixed Branches:
      MOODLE_21_STABLE, MOODLE_22_STABLE
    • Pull Master Branch:

      Description

      The backup and restore of resources from Moodle 1.9.x to Moodle 2.x does not preserve linking between resources.

      I think this patch fixes this problem.

      mk

        Gliffy Diagrams

          Issue Links

            Activity

            Mawuli Kuivi created issue -
            Hide
            Michael de Raadt added a comment -

            Thanks for reporting that and sharing a patch.

            Could you provide a set of replication steps, just so we know the circumstances?

            Show
            Michael de Raadt added a comment - Thanks for reporting that and sharing a patch. Could you provide a set of replication steps, just so we know the circumstances?
            Michael de Raadt made changes -
            Field Original Value New Value
            Fix Version/s STABLE backlog [ 10463 ]
            Labels patch triaged
            Michael de Raadt made changes -
            Priority Minor [ 4 ] Major [ 3 ]
            Hide
            Tõnis Tartes added a comment -

            This is just what i was looking for!

            Thank you Mawuli!!

            The same problem is addressed also in forum - http://moodle.org/mod/forum/discuss.php?d=193152

            Show
            Tõnis Tartes added a comment - This is just what i was looking for! Thank you Mawuli!! The same problem is addressed also in forum - http://moodle.org/mod/forum/discuss.php?d=193152
            Hide
            Mawuli Kuivi added a comment -

            Steps for replication:
            The problem was that when you have files in the 1.9 system linked inside some html resource or resource, the backup and restore to 2.x might create problems.

            If the link to the files are in the root directory of the course, then you do not have a problem.

            But if you link to some file say /dir1/dir2/filename, then this creates the problem. The restore does not create the correct link to the file. It creates to link to /filename instead of /dir1/dir2/filename.

            The /dir1/dir2/filename will correctly be restores but any resource linking to this file will end up with a problem,

            Lets create two files.

            1. /dir1/dir2/filename1
            2. /dir1/filename2

            Inside /dir1/filename2 this file, we have say
            <a href="dir2/filename1">conference</a>

            Now when you restore this to 2.x, the link inside /dir1/filename2 will now be pointing to
            <a href="filename1">conference</a> instead of <a href="dir2/filename1">conference</a>

            Hope this helps to replicate the problem.

            mk

            Show
            Mawuli Kuivi added a comment - Steps for replication: The problem was that when you have files in the 1.9 system linked inside some html resource or resource, the backup and restore to 2.x might create problems. If the link to the files are in the root directory of the course, then you do not have a problem. But if you link to some file say /dir1/dir2/filename, then this creates the problem. The restore does not create the correct link to the file. It creates to link to /filename instead of /dir1/dir2/filename. The /dir1/dir2/filename will correctly be restores but any resource linking to this file will end up with a problem, Lets create two files. 1. /dir1/dir2/filename1 2. /dir1/filename2 Inside /dir1/filename2 this file, we have say <a href="dir2/filename1">conference</a> Now when you restore this to 2.x, the link inside /dir1/filename2 will now be pointing to <a href="filename1">conference</a> instead of <a href="dir2/filename1">conference</a> Hope this helps to replicate the problem. mk
            Eric Merrill made changes -
            Pull Master Diff URL https://github.com/merrill-oakland/moodle/compare/moodle%3Amaster...MDL-32012
            Pull Master Branch MDL-32012
            Testing Instructions Create backup:
            In Moodle 1.9 -
            In course file, create a folder, in it place two files, a image, and a html file that loads that image as a relative path (<img src="img.jpg>").
            On the front page of the course, and a Link to a file and link to the html file.
            Backup the course and download it.

            NOTE: I've attached a sample backup that is confirmed to exhibit the behavior, and also includes a 3 level deep folder test.



            In moodle 2.x
            Go into a course, go to restore, and add the 1.9 backup.
            You can restore into the existing course, merging, and use all the default settings, except on step "4. Schema" set overwrite course settings to Yes (this is because of a seeming bug that makes legacy files that may be needed by resources unavailable unless this is done).

            Complete the restore.

            Bad behavior:
            If you edit the resource created, you will notice that img.html is at the base level, instead of in a folder. If you were to upgrade the 1.9 site it would be in the subfolder.
            If you try and view the resource, the image will show as broken.

            Behavior after patch:
            The file structure is recreated in the resource, and when you view the resource, it will load in the image.
            Pull 2.2 Diff URL https://github.com/merrill-oakland/moodle/compare/moodle%3AMOODLE_22_STABLE...MDL-32012_m22
            Pull 2.1 Branch MDL-32012_m21
            Pull 2.2 Branch MDL-32012_m22
            Pull 2.1 Diff URL https://github.com/merrill-oakland/moodle/compare/moodle%3AMOODLE_21_STABLE...MDL-32012_m21
            Pull from Repository git://github.com/merrill-oakland/moodle.git
            Attachment backup-resource-20120420-1055.zip [ 27992 ]
            Hide
            Eric Merrill added a comment -

            We have also been seeing this problem.

            I've added testing instructions, pull branches for 2.1, 2.2 and master (thanks for the patch Mawuli!), and a 1.9 backup file to help with testing.

            Show
            Eric Merrill added a comment - We have also been seeing this problem. I've added testing instructions, pull branches for 2.1, 2.2 and master (thanks for the patch Mawuli!), and a 1.9 backup file to help with testing.
            Hide
            Eric Merrill added a comment -

            Oh, I also tested the patch and a few test cases and it seems to work as it should.

            Show
            Eric Merrill added a comment - Oh, I also tested the patch and a few test cases and it seems to work as it should.
            Eric Merrill made changes -
            Assignee moodle.com [ moodle.com ] Eric Merrill [ emerrill ]
            Eric Merrill made changes -
            Status Open [ 1 ] Waiting for peer review [ 10012 ]
            Hide
            Michael de Raadt added a comment -

            Thanks for adding more information.

            I'll see if we can get this peer reviewed soon.

            Show
            Michael de Raadt added a comment - Thanks for adding more information. I'll see if we can get this peer reviewed soon.
            Dan Poltawski made changes -
            Original Estimate 0 minutes [ 0 ]
            Remaining Estimate 0 minutes [ 0 ]
            Status Waiting for peer review [ 10012 ] Peer review in progress [ 10013 ]
            Peer reviewer poltawski
            Hide
            Dan Poltawski added a comment -

            Thanks everyone for your work on this - it looks good to me, submitting for integration!

            Show
            Dan Poltawski added a comment - Thanks everyone for your work on this - it looks good to me, submitting for integration!
            Dan Poltawski made changes -
            Status Peer review in progress [ 10013 ] Waiting for integration review [ 10010 ]
            Hide
            Eloy Lafuente (stronk7) added a comment -

            The main moodle.git repository has just been updated with latest weekly modifications. You may wish to rebase your PULL branches to simplify history and avoid any possible merge conflicts. This would also make integrator's life easier next week.

            TIA and ciao

            Show
            Eloy Lafuente (stronk7) added a comment - The main moodle.git repository has just been updated with latest weekly modifications. You may wish to rebase your PULL branches to simplify history and avoid any possible merge conflicts. This would also make integrator's life easier next week. TIA and ciao
            Hide
            Eric Merrill added a comment -

            Rebased.

            Show
            Eric Merrill added a comment - Rebased.
            Sam Hemelryk made changes -
            Currently in integration Yes [ 10041 ]
            Sam Hemelryk made changes -
            Status Waiting for integration review [ 10010 ] Integration review in progress [ 10004 ]
            Integrator samhemelryk
            Hide
            Sam Hemelryk added a comment -

            Thanks guys this has been integrated now.
            Please note I did make an extra commit to fix whitespace however.

            Cheers
            Sam

            Show
            Sam Hemelryk added a comment - Thanks guys this has been integrated now. Please note I did make an extra commit to fix whitespace however. Cheers Sam
            Sam Hemelryk made changes -
            Status Integration review in progress [ 10004 ] Waiting for testing [ 10005 ]
            Fix Version/s 2.1.6 [ 12052 ]
            Fix Version/s 2.2.3 [ 12053 ]
            Fix Version/s STABLE backlog [ 10463 ]
            Michael de Raadt made changes -
            Tester rwijaya
            Rossiani Wijaya made changes -
            Status Waiting for testing [ 10005 ] Testing in progress [ 10011 ]
            Hide
            Rossiani Wijaya added a comment -

            This looks great.

            Test passed.

            Show
            Rossiani Wijaya added a comment - This looks great. Test passed.
            Rossiani Wijaya made changes -
            Status Testing in progress [ 10011 ] Tested [ 10006 ]
            Hide
            Eloy Lafuente (stronk7) added a comment -

            UPDATE tracker_issues
               SET status = 'Closed',
                  comment = 'Thanks!'
            WHEN participants = 'Did a gorgeous work'
            

            This landed upstream some hours ago (some - me - developer fell slept in the sofa yesterday before spamming this).

            Show
            Eloy Lafuente (stronk7) added a comment - UPDATE tracker_issues SET status = 'Closed', comment = 'Thanks!' WHEN participants = 'Did a gorgeous work' This landed upstream some hours ago (some - me - developer fell slept in the sofa yesterday before spamming this).
            Eloy Lafuente (stronk7) made changes -
            Status Tested [ 10006 ] Closed [ 6 ]
            Resolution Fixed [ 1 ]
            Currently in integration Yes [ 10041 ]
            Integration date 04/May/12
            Michael de Raadt made changes -
            Link This issue will help resolve MDL-21380 [ MDL-21380 ]
            David Mudrak made changes -
            Link This issue has been marked as being related by MDL-37774 [ MDL-37774 ]

              People

              • Votes:
                4 Vote for this issue
                Watchers:
                7 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                • Created:
                  Updated:
                  Resolved: